| TTI Research Supervisor: Nathan D. Schulz, Ph.D. Associate Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System TAMU 3135, College Station, Texas, 77843-3135 (979)317-2694 [email protected] | Pooled Fund Technical Representative: Chris Lindsey Transportation Engineer Design Division Texas Department of Transportation 6230 E Stassney Lane Austin, TX 78744 (512) 416-2750 [email protected] |
The TTI research team will identify the guardrail gate design needs to meet the field and site conditions encountered by state DOTs that would benefit from a hinge guardrail gate system. If needed, a survey will be distributed to the Pooled Fund state members to gather field information and design needs. Details such as guardrail gate length, gate components and function, and others will be collected.
Three design concepts will be developed to meet the needs identified previously. Advantages and disadvantages will be developed for each design concept. A single design concept will be selected in consultation with the Pooled Fund technical representative for further evaluation in Task 2. If needed, simplified computer simulations of the design may be performed to verify aspects of the design such as strength prior to proceeding to Task 2. The simplified model of the design may incorporate simplified components, smaller model size, and other techniques to allow a quick check of the design prior to performing full-scale simulations in Task 2.
The research team will build a finite element computer model of the guardrail gate design concept selected in Task 1. The design concept will be evaluated according to MASH TL-3 with finite element computer simulations. This will consist of impacting the guardrail gate system design concept with the 1100C FE vehicle model and 2270P FE vehicle model. The impact speed will be 62 mph, and the impact angle will be 25 degrees. Each computer simulation will be assessed according to the MASH TL-3 evaluation criteria. Different impact locations will be considered, if necessary.
Additional computer simulations may be performed to optimize the design concept. If the design concept is determined to not perform satisfactorily in the computer simulations, then the TTI research team may consider evaluation of another design concept identified in the previous Task 1.
Once a guardrail gate system has been determined to exhibit satisfactory performance in the computer the simulations, full-scale crash testing will be performed to further evaluate the system.
Task 3 – Construction and Crash TestingThe TTI Proving Grounds will perform two full-scale crash tests on the guardrail gate system according to MASH TL-3. One full-scale test will involve a 2,420-lb passenger car impacting the guardrail gate system at a 62 mph nominal speed and a 25 degree angle. One full-scale test will involve a 5,000-lb pickup truck impacting the guardrail gate system at a 62 mph nominal speed and a 25 degree angle.
The TTI research team will assess the crash tests according to the evaluation criteria set in MASH standards
The TTI research team will generate a final report of the findings from the research. The results will include the design concept development, computer simulation analyses, and full-scale crash testing. The crash test results will be reported in terms of guardrail gate system performance, vehicle stability, and occupant risk factors and will be compared with respect to MASH crashworthiness criteria. Detailed drawings of the guardrail gate system will be included in the final report for implementation into state DOT standard detail sheets.